CollBar serves a wide range of public entities and unionized employers. Here is a look at the types of organizations that benefit most from our services — and the specific challenges we help each one address.
Showing 10 of 10 ideas
Cities and Municipalities
Managing multiple bargaining units (police, fire, general employees, public works), pension obligations, and competing budget priorities while maintaining service levels.
K-12 School Districts
Navigating complex step-and-lane salary schedules, TRS/STRS pension costs, certificated vs. classified employee agreements, and school board communication challenges.
Fire Districts and Regional Fire Authorities
Interest arbitration preparation, IAFF contract negotiations, FLSA overtime rules for 24-hour shifts, and managing pension costs in fiscally constrained districts.
Public Transit Agencies
ATU contract negotiations, managing shift differentials and service coverage requirements, and benchmarking compensation against comparable transit systems.
Counties
Multi-union environments, sheriff and corrections officer contracts, comprehensive compensation studies across dozens of job classifications, and PERC proceedings.
Public Utility Districts (PUDs)
IBEW negotiations, specialized technical classification studies, and managing a unique mix of utility-sector and government-sector compensation benchmarks.
Healthcare Systems
1199SEIU, AFSCME, and SEIU contract negotiations, Taft-Hartley benefit fund cost modeling, and managing complex benefits structures across large employee populations.
Port Districts
Multi-union environments, ILWU and Teamsters negotiations, specialized classification studies for port operations, and managing grant-funded compensation requirements.
Library Systems
Compensation benchmarking in a sector with unique classification challenges, AFSCME negotiations, and developing defensible pay structures for small HR teams.
9-1-1 Communication Centers
Specialized dispatcher classification and compensation studies, managing shift-work pay differentials, and benchmarking against other regional communication centers.
Pro Tips
Compare your compensation against agencies that compete for the same talent, not just geographically close ones
Your actual labor market competitors may not be your geographic neighbors. A city competing with the private sector for IT talent needs different comparables than for public works.
Model the cost of turnover before deciding compensation adjustments are too expensive
Recruiting, hiring, and training a replacement typically costs 50-200% of annual salary. Competitive pay often costs less than turnover.
Consider total compensation, not just base salary, when benchmarking
Benefits can represent 30-40% of total compensation. Some agencies that appear low on salary are actually above market when benefits are included.
Review your comparable agency list every 3 years
Labor markets shift as agencies grow, merge, or change service levels. Your comparables should reflect current competitive realities.